Citations to Google Scholar Case Law Documents Retrieved Using the Search Term: (fracking AND ohio)

 

  1. Newbury Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Lomak Petroleum (Ohio), Inc.

    62 Ohio St. 3d 387, 583 NE 2d 302 - Ohio: Supreme Court, 1992 - Google Scholar

    62 Ohio St.3d 387 (1992). NEWBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES,
    APPELLANT, v. LOMAK PETROLEUM (OHIO), INC., APPELLEE. No. 90-1709. Supreme
    Court of Ohio. Submitted October 15, 1991. Decided January 15, 1992. 
    ...

  2. Banford v. Aldrich Chem. Co., Inc.

    126 Ohio St. 3d 210, 2010 Ohio 2470, 932 NE … - Ohio: Supreme …, 2010 - Google Scholar

    126 Ohio St.3d 210 (2010). 2010-Ohio-2470. BANFORD ET AL.; FERGUSON, Appellee,
    v. ALDRICH CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., Appellant. No. 2009-0305. Supreme Court
    of Ohio. Submitted December 16, 2009. Decided June 9, 2010. 
    ...

  3. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.

    272 US 365, 47 S. Ct. 114, 71 L. Ed. 303 - Supreme Court, 1926 - Google Scholar

    ... Decided November 22, 1926. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
    THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. ... 379 MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion
    of the Court. The Village of Euclid is an Ohio municipal corporation. 
    ...

  4. STATE EX REL. BOTT LAW GROUP, LLC v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

    2013 Ohio 5219 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 10th Appellate Dist., 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... Ohio. {¶ 3} In 2010, two of relator's clients, Patriot Water Treatment LLC ("Patriot"),
    and the city of Warren, Ohio ("Warren") obtained fracking permits from the Ohio
    Environmental Protection Agency ("OEPA"). Relator subsequently 
    ...

  5. AQUA OHIO, INC. v. ALLIED INDUS. DEV. CORP., INC.

    2014 Ohio 1473 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 7th Appellate Dist., 2014 - Google Scholar

    ... This waterline provides access to another waterline that can transport water from Lake
    McKelvey to Aqua Ohio's potential fracking customers. That lake's water is low in
    sulfates and is allegedly the type of water needed for fracking. 
    ...

  6. Boggs v. LANDMARK 4 LLC

    Dist. Court, ND Ohio, 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") activities of Landmark. Plaintiffs allege that beginning in September
    of 2008, Landmark, an oil and gas well operator, engaged in drilling and hydraulic fracturing
    activities, and operated Allard Well Nos. 3-A and 4-A near Medina Township, Ohio. 
    ...

  7. Mangan v. LANDMARK 4 LLC

    Dist. Court, ND Ohio, 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") activities of Landmark. Plaintiffs allege that beginning in September
    of 2008, Landmark, an oil and gas well operator, engaged in drilling and hydraulic fracturing
    activities, and operated Allard Well Nos. 3-A and 4-A near Medina Township, Ohio. 
    ...

  8. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy Trust

    268 SW 3d 1, 146 Tex. 575 - Tex: Supreme Court, 2008 - Google Scholar

    268 SW3d 1 (2008). COASTAL OIL & GAS CORP. and Coastal Oil & Gas USA, LP,
    Petitioners, v. GARZA ENERGY TRUST et al., Respondents. No. 05-0466. Supreme Court
    of Texas. August 29, 2008. Rehearing Denied November 14, 2008. 
    ...

  9. Leaf v. EPA

    118 F. 3d 1467 - Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, 1997 - Google Scholar

    118 F.3d 1467 (1997). LEGAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, INC., Petitioner,
    v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. No. 95-6501.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. August 7, 1997. 
    ...

  10. United States v. Morrison

    529 US 598, 120 S. Ct. 1740, 146 L. Ed. 2d 658 - Supreme Court, 2000 - Google Scholar

    529 US 598 (2000). UNITED STATES v. MORRISON et al. No. 99-5. United States Supreme
    Court. Argued January 11, 2000. Decided May 15, 2000. [*]. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
    STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 
    ...

  11. Anschutz v. Town of Dryden

    35 Misc. 3d 450, 940 NYS 2d 458, 2012 NY … - NY: Supreme Court, …, 2012 - Google Scholar

    ... The Marcellus shale formation extends northeast from Ohio and West Virginia, through
    Pennsylvania, into southern and central New York. ... Bd. of Trustees v Lomak Petroleum (Ohio),
    Inc., (62 Ohio St 3d 387, 583 NE2d 302 ([1992]) instructive in this case. 
    ...

  12. Lyons v. Limbach

    40 Ohio St. 3d 92, 532 NE 2d 106 - Ohio: Supreme Court, 1988 - Google Scholar

    ... This softens the rock so that the oil will flow through the rock to be extracted. This "fracking"
    requires much fresh water, and this quantity of water is not always readily available. ...
    Moreover, in Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. Lindley (1981), 65 Ohio St. 
    ...

  13. Buffington & Sullivan v. Birdwell

    395 P. 2d 795 - Okla: Supreme Court, 1964 - Google Scholar

    ... In view of the evidence in this case, there is insufficient basis for concluding that, as to the
    particular well involved herein, the bullet method of sand fracking, if it had initially and singly
    been used would have been any more effective in ... 2) and Gedra v. Dallmer Co., 153 Ohio St. 
    ...

  14. Boggs v. LANDMARK 4 LLC

    Dist. Court, ND Ohio, 2012 - Google Scholar

    ... hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") activities of Landmark. Plaintiffs allege that beginning in September
    of 2008, Landmark, an oil and gas well operator, engaged in drilling and hydraulic fracturing
    activities, and operated Allard Well Nos. 3-A and 4-A near Medina Township, Ohio. 
    ...

  15. US v. Smith

    749 F. 3d 465 - Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, 2014 - Google Scholar

    ... Timothy J. McKenna, Timothy J. McKenna, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant M. Smith
    in 11-5852 and 12-5695. ... This process, which is commonly known as "fracking," requires
    an additional investment of time and expense by the drilling company. 
    ...

  16. [CITATION] In re United English and Scottish Assurance Co. ex parte Hawkins

    3 HL 330 - 1868

  17. Parcoil Corp. v. Nowsco Well Service, Ltd.

    887 F. 2d 502 - Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit, 1989 - Google Scholar

    ... We have considered the question of continuity previously. [2] Brandenburg v. Seidel, 859 F.2d
    1179 (4th Cir.1988); Walk v. Baltimore & Ohio RR, 847 F.2d 1100 (4th Cir.1988), vacated and
    remanded for further consideration in light of HJ Inc., ___ US ___, 109 S.Ct. 
    ...

  18. US v. Smith

    Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, 2014 - Google Scholar

    ... Timothy J. McKenna, TIMOTHY J. MCKENNA, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant M. Smith
    in 11-5852 and 12-5695. ... This process, which is commonly known as "fracking," requires an
    additional investment of time and expense by the drilling company. 
    ...

  19. BOMBARDIERE v. SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

    Dist. Court, ND West Virginia, 2011 - Google Scholar

    ... 23-4-2(c), (Count III) alter ego, (Count IV) agency, (Count V) strict liability, (Count VI) preparation
    and use of proprietary chemical fracking fluids, (Count VII ... laws, as follows: "Moreover, the court
    is hardly troubled by the prospect of having to apply the substantive law of Ohio to this 
    ...

  20. United States v. Lopez

    514 US 549, 115 S. Ct. 1624, 131 L. Ed. 2d 626 - Supreme Court, 1995 - Google Scholar

    ... way that the possession of a gun in a school zone does not. Roscoe Filburn operated
    a small farm in Ohio, on which, in the year involved, he raised 23 acres of wheat.
    It was his practice to sow winter wheat in the fall, and after 
    ...

  21. Shamblin v. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

    Dist. Court, MD Pennsylvania, 2014 - Google Scholar

    ... See, eg Brewer v. Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co., No. 1:03 CV 0434, 2004 WL 5508630,
    at *1 (ND Ohio Oct. ... 62), Preclude Discussion of the Joint Representation of Defendants
    (Doc. 66), and Preclude Discussion of Fracking (Doc. 61). 
    ...

  22. WARREN DRILLING CO., INC. v. EQUITABLE PRODUCTION COMPANY

    Dist. Court, SD Ohio, 2014 - Google Scholar

    ... that provides drilling services in connection with oil and gas wells in the Appalachian Basin areas
    of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania and ... In their complaint, the Hagys alleged that defendants used
    a hydraulic fracturing drilling process that discharged fracking fluid into the ground 
    ...

  23. In re Cassetto

    475 BR 874 - Bankr. Court, ND Ohio, 2012 - Google Scholar

    ... He further argues that, because oil and gas drilling is regulated by the State of Ohio, the Debtors
    have exaggerated any inconvenience they may ... of the Oil and Gas Lease on the basis that (i)
    there are alleged environmental issues associated with hydraulic fracking; (ii) "even 
    ...

  24. Hill v. SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY

    Dist. Court, ED Arkansas, 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... If the waste fluid has migrated, interesting and difficult damage issues may well arise, not least
    because, given how fracking is done and what the parties' leases authorize, there was liquid
    waste beneath plaintiffs' property before any ... [2] The Court notes that the Ohio law argued 
    ...

  25. COUNTY COM'RS v. Bowen/Edwards Assoc.

    830 P. 2d 1045 - Colo: Supreme Court, 1992 - Google Scholar

    830 P.2d 1045 (1992). BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, LA PLATA COUNTY,
    Colorado, Petitioner, v. BOWEN/EDWARDS ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent. No.
    90SC516. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. June 8, 1992. 
    ...

  26. TWA RESOURCES v. COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.

    Del: Superior Court, 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... The Marcellus Shale [2] is a large geographic formation that stretches from Ohio and West Virginia
    into Pennsylvania and ... and advancements in drilling technology, specifically horizontal drilling
    and high pressure, multi-stage hydraulic fracturing (often called "fracking" or "fracing 
    ...

  27. BEAVERKETTLE FARMS, LTD. v. CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, LLC

    Dist. Court, ND Ohio, 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... Shale is a gas-rich formation deep underground that extends across Pennsylvania, West Virginia,
    New York, Ohio and Maryland . . ... Furthermore, according to the US Environmental Protection
    Agency, research is ongoing to understand the potential risks associated with fracking. 
    ...

  28. Fuentes v. Shevin

    407 US 67, 92 S. Ct. 1983, 32 L. Ed. 2d 556 - Supreme Court, 1972 - Google Scholar

    ... But cf. A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 US 205. [31] See Brady v. United States, 397 US 742,
    748; Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 US 458, 464. In the civil area, the Court has said that "[w]e do not
    presume acquiescence in the loss of fundamental rights," Ohio Bell Tel. Co. 
    ...

  29. Sharon Steel Corp. v. City of Fairmont

    334 SE 2d 616, 175 W. Va. 479 - W Va: Supreme Court of Appeals, 1985 - Google Scholar

    ... W.Va. 688, 79 SE 660 (1913), a carpenter shop with a steam engine, Wood v. City
    of Hinton, 47 W.Va. 645, 35 SE 824 (1900), damage to property adjacent to a railroad
    track, Guinn v. Ohio River RR Co., 46 W.Va. 151, 33 SE 
    ...

  30. Voss v. Lundvall Bros., Inc.

    830 P. 2d 1061 - Colo: Supreme Court, 1992 - Google Scholar

    830 P.2d 1061 (1992). Gayle VOSS, City Clerk of the City of Greeley, a municipal
    corporation, Vitus Einsphar, Fire Chief, City of Greeley Fire Department, the Election
    Board of the City of Greeley, a municipal corporation, the 
    ...

  31. [CITATION] Dunham v. Kirkpatrick

    101 Pa. 36 - 1882

  32. Brown v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

    Dist. Court, ND Ohio, 2014 - Google Scholar

    ... RTG, Inc. v. State, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1, 13 (2002). ... Moreover, plaintiffs' reliance on Boggs is
    misplaced. In Boggs, the Hon. Donald C. Nugent of this District held that plaintiffs plausibly
    alleged hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, was an ultra-hazardous activity. 
    ...

  33. Dent v. CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, LLC

    Dist. Court, ND West Virginia, 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... the plaintiffs filed a motion to remand, wherein they ask this Court to remand this civil action to
    the Circuit Court of Ohio County, both ... The plaintiffs further claim that the defendants applied a
    gas extraction method known as hydraulic fracturing or "fracking" on the Hall property in 
    ...

  34. Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Council of Oakmont

    964 A. 2d 855, 600 Pa. 207 - Pa: Supreme Court, 2009 - Google Scholar

    ... v. Bath Township, 118 Ohio App.3d 438, 693 NE2d 297 (1997) (holding that, where the state
    oil and gas statute prescribed a specific setback distance for oil wells relative to habitable
    structures, localities were precluded from increasing those distances through zoning). 
    ...

  35. Beardslee v. Inflection Energy, LLC

    904 F. Supp. 2d 213 - Dist. Court, ND New York, 2012 - Google Scholar

    ... drilling [3] and high volume hydraulic fracturing ("HVHF" or "hydro fracking") [4] to develop the
    Marcellus Shale and other low-permeability gas reservoirs. [5] According to the DEC, the Marcellus
    Shale is a shale formation extending deep underground from Ohio and West 
    ...

  36. Aukema v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC

    904 F. Supp. 2d 199 - Dist. Court, ND New York, 2012 - Google Scholar

    ... drilling [4] and high volume hydraulic fracturing ("HVHF" or "hydro fracking") [5] 203 to develop
    the Marcellus Shale and other low-permeability gas reservoirs. [6] According to the DEC, the
    Marcellus Shale is a shale formation extending deep underground from Ohio and West 
    ...

  37. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictis

    480 US 470, 107 S. Ct. 1232, 94 L. Ed. 2d 472 - Supreme Court, 1987 - Google Scholar

    480 US 470 (1987). KEYSTONE BITUMINOUS COAL ASSN. ET AL. v. DEBENEDICTIS,
    SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES,
    ET AL. No. 85-1092. Supreme Court of United States. 
    ...

  38. Seattle Audubon Soc. v. Espy

    998 F. 2d 699 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 1993 - Google Scholar

    998 F.2d 699 (1993). SEATTLE AUDUBON SOCIETY; Pilchuck Audubon Society;
    Washington Environmental Council; Washington Native Plants Society, et al.,
    Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Mike ESPY, [*] in his official capacity as Secretary 
    ...

  39. Mowrer v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co., Inc.

    518 F. 2d 659 - Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, 1975 - Google Scholar

    ... The reasonableness of the use of land is available as a defense (Niagara Oil Co. v. Jackson,
    supra, 48 Ind.App. at 241, 91 NE at 826-827) and presents a question for the jury. Ohio Oil
    Co. v. Westfall, 43 Ind. App. 661, 663-664, 88 NE 354, 355 (1909). 
    ...

  40. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. Corporation Commission

    378 P. 2d 847 - Okla: Supreme Court, 1963 - Google Scholar

    ... Company, joined by other lessees and operators, Gulf Oil Corporation, Sun Oil Company, Sunray
    Mid-Continent Oil Company, and The Ohio Oil Company ... the basis of some of the competent
    evidence, the fact that some of the wells may be treated by sand fracking excludes the 
    ...

  41. Natural Resources Defense Council v. USEPA

    907 F. 2d 1146 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit, 1990 - Google Scholar

    ... v. Cartier, Inc., 486 US 281, 108 S.Ct. 1811, 1817, 100 L.Ed.2d 313 (1988), and we must employ
    traditional tools of statutory construction, including, where appropriate, legislative history. Ohio
    v. United States Department of the Interior, 880 F.2d 432, 441 (DCCir.1989). 
    ...

  42. STRUDLEY v. ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION

    Colo: Court of Appeals, 1st Div., 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... (4) a review of company-performed ambient air sampling during the hydraulic fracking process
    and afterward (5) determining what quality ... For example, the Ohio Court of Appeals, in Simeone
    v. Girard City Board of Education 872 NE2d 344, 350 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007), stated: 
    ...

  43. Beardslee v. INFLECTION ENERGY, LLC

    Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, 2014 - Google Scholar

    ... bordering Pennsylvania, Tioga County sits on the Marcellus Shale, "a black shale formation
    extending deep underground from Ohio and West ... HVHF — also commonly known as "fracking" —
    is "an unconventional drilling technology which involves the injection of more than a 
    ...

  44. TWA RESOURCES v. COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.

    Del: Superior Court, 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... The Marcellus Shale is a geographic formation that stretches from Ohio and West Virginia
    into Pennsylvania and Southern New York, and contains large quantities of natural gas. ...
    ("CPX"), as a potential partner for high pressure fracking. 
    ...

  45. Wiser v. Enervest Operating, LLC

    803 F. Supp. 2d 109 - Dist. Court, ND New York, 2011 - Google Scholar

    ... The state's moratorium on horizontal high-volume hydro-fracking for recovery of gas from the
    Marcellus Shale formation, assuming that it ... The Marcellus Shale is a black shale formation
    extending deep underground from Ohio and West Virginia northeast into Pennsylvania and 
    ...

  46. Amoco Oil Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

    501 F. 2d 722 - Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit, 1974 - Google Scholar

    501 F.2d 722 (1974). AMOCO OIL COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. ASHLAND OIL, INC. and Skelly Oil Company,
    Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. 
    ...

  47. NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. APPROXIMATELY 9117.53 ACRES IN PRATT, KINGMAN

    Dist. Court, D. Kansas, 2012 - Google Scholar

    ... Compounding the problem is the risk that if defendants retain the well bores now sought by
    Northern and use fracking techniques to explore other zones, the well bores may be ... v. 4.895 Acres
    of Land, 2008 WL 4758688 (SD Ohio, Oct, 27, 2008)("issuance of an injunction ... 
    ...

  48. Northern Plains Resource v. Surface Transp. Bd.

    668 F. 3d 1067 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 2011 - Google Scholar

    ... As an initial matter, Petitioners do not cite any authority supporting their claim that the Board must
    consider harmful effects other than those to direct competitors under this factor. See, eg, Indiana
    & Ohio Ry. Co.—Construction and Operation, 9 ICC 2d 783, 794 (1993). 
    ...

  49. TW Phillips Gas and Oil Co. v. Jedlicka

    42 A. 3d 261, 615 Pa. 199 - Pa: Supreme Court, 2012 - Google Scholar

    ... 1] Hydrofracturing, or fracking, is a ... though drilling and equipment costs may never be repaid and
    the undertaking considered as a whole may ultimately result in a loss"); Landauer, supra (same);
    Kerr v. Hillenberg, 373 P.2d 66 (Okla.1962) (same); Blausey v. Stein, 61 Ohio St.2d 
    ...

  50. In re Patriot Coal Corp.

    493 BR 65 - Bankr. Court, ED Missouri, 2013 - Google Scholar

    ... On November 15, 2012, Debtors and the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc., West Virginia
    Highlands Conservancy, Inc. ... This is believed to be caused in part because of technological
    advances in hydraulic fracking, which is generally a more efficient means of extracting 
    ...

Knowledge Discovery Technology by Knowledge Discovery Solutions, Inc.

For more information please contact Steve Jacobs: steve.jacobs@ideal-group.org